Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 81.2 against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it is somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.