Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 81.2 score against 81. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter device than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both have similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.