Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's overall score of 81.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably thinner but extremely heavier than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition, a back camera with much less megapixels and a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 7% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.