Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a general score of 90, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro design is extremely newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower screen density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor, a back camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
HTC U Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.