Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.64 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is much better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a overall score of 90 against 79.9. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although it's the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also an a lot older, thicker and a bit heavier cellphone.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with way more brightness and a little greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.