Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's general score of 90. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, even though both of them were released only 6 months apart. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also counts with a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A52, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a much bigger camera sensor, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much higher 108 MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.