Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.64 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has an overall score of 90, which is slightly better than Galaxy F62's global score of 88.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the same thickness and weight than Galaxy F62.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same screen pixel density, a display of the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a really brighter screen. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments, a back camera with much more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a 40% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.