Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, with a 97.6 score against 90. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10, so it offers some additional features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is incredibly thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, although it is notably heavier and was released about 12 months before.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.