Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's score of 90. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little larger screen, a better pixels number in each display inch and much more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery lifetime that's very similar to Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's battery life.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and worse 24 fps video frame rates, they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same back camera sensor size and the same video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.