Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's general score of 90. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and way thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a better count of pixels per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, way more brightness and a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.