Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-01 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 13.64 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is much better than Galaxy S6 Active, having a global score of 90 against 80.9. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has newer 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing some extra features. The Galaxy S6 Active has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.