Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has an overall score of 90, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and much lower brightness, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel density. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera and a lot higher video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.