Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 90 score against 80.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.