Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 13.64 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, getting a general score of 90.6 against 90. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, although it is heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger diafragm aperture and a camera with way more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.