Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.65 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having an 87.9 score against 87.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Mi 10T is a older, a little heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more screen brightness. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi 10T takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations and a lot smaller sensor, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.