Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.65 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Even though Xiaomi Mi 10T is a better phone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it must be told that it's also an extremely older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier phone.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with much more brightness and a just a little greater display pixels density.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 10T has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor, a much better video resolution and a lot more MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 10T one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.