Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.65 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 10T's 87.9 score. Galaxy F62's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi 10T, but it's a bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a screen of the same size and a higher pixel number per inch of display, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has way more brightness. The Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a higher number of cores (and faster). Xiaomi Mi 10T has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega-pixels and the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.