Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T, having a 97.6 score against 87.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy Fold is older and extremely heavier than Xiaomi Mi 10T, it's design is still a lot thinner.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.