Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T's 87.9 global score. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi 10T were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a higher pixel density, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a camera in the back with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.