Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.65 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a general score of 87.9 against 80.4. Xiaomi Mi 10T's design is incredibly newer, but thicker and way heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Mi 10T features a bit better processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a display that is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 10T's display, because although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Mi 10T shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better video quality, a lot larger camera sensor taking much higher quality photos and a way more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.