Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.62 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a general score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has an older 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density and a lot brighter display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a way better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 features as much memory to store more apps and games as the Xiaomi Mi 10T one, both have the same internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S25, because although it has a smaller sensor and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.