Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.62 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T's overall score of 87.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display, a really brighter screen, a little bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better 200 MP resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a battery performance that's just as good as the battery duration in Xiaomi Mi 10T.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.