Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 10T is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it is also somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi 10T features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a lot more opaque screen and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Mi 10T captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.