Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T is just a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active, with an 87.9 score against 81.9. Xiaomi Mi 10T's body is much newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy S8 Active's, but it's a little bit heavier. Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 10T shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.