Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S9's general score of 83.3. Xiaomi Mi 10T's design is noticeably newer, but thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S9. Galaxy S9 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 10T takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S9 has a better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 400 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.