Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.65 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 87.9 score against 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has an older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Xiaomi Mi 10T and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a couple months difference, the Xiaomi Mi 10T is way thinner and somewhat lighter.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.