Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T, getting an 88.5 score against 87.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Even though Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Mi 10T were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Flip is a lot thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a same size screen.
Xiaomi Mi 10T shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a way better video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 10T has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.