Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | -- |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.61 ounces | -- |
| Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, having a overall score of 90.7 against 85. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has Android 11, providing some extra features. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a lot brighter display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features much more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.