Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 85 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also lighter and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4250mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.