Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z Force, having a 90.7 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than Moto Z Force. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the previous 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.