Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | -- |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having a score of 90.7 against 76.2. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra design is a little bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an older 11 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has way more display brightness, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a better screen density and a little bit larger screen. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A16 5G has more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's battery life is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra one.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images and video, they both have a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.