Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a general score of 90.7 against 79.9. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has much more brightness, a little bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a greater pixel count in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G's battery life is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's battery performance. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have a 50 mega-pixels camera, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a way better video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.