Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | -- |
| Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy A52's general score of 90.7. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A52, but it is somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bigger display, a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.