Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 8.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's overall score of 79. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's design is newer and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a bit bigger display, a better pixel number in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a much better video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.