Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Horizon blue and Midnight gray | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 has a general score of 88.8, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices include Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 11 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite inferior pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a lot larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 11 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a much better video resolution and a much bigger sensor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.