Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2021-05-31 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Celestial Silver, Cosmic Black and Frosty White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11i is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 89.5 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 11i design is newer and notably thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi Mi 11i counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because although it has much lower brightness and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixel density. Xiaomi Mi 11i features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 11i features a way better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Xiaomi Mi 11i counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4520mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.