Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-05-31 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Celestial Silver, Cosmic Black and Frosty White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11i is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 89.5 against 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11i body is newer, way thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Xiaomi Mi 11i has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way worse display pixels density, it also counts with a really larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 11i has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11i also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11i captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot better video resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 11i has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4520mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.