Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 269.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, having a overall score of 88.3 against 68.9. The Galaxy S10 construction is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi-3. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 features a little bit better display than Galaxy S10, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a quite lower screen density and a little smaller display. The Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 has a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 is a bit more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi-3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.