Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 4.4.3 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than Xiaomi Mi 4, having a score of 85.3 against 75.2. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is a lot newer and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 4's, although it's also heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Mi 4 comes with Android 4.4.3 OS. IPhone 11 Pro Max and Xiaomi Mi 4 both count with extremely similar screens, although the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a larger screen, a just a bit greater display density and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a greater performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM, more cores and a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with less megapixels, and they both have the same camera aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 4's one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi 4, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.