Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 4, with a general score of 81.9 against 75.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo body is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Mi 4. These devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760, a bigger display and a little bit better quantity of pixels in each display inch. Xiaomi Mi 4 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 3080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.