Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Xiaomi Mi 4, with a overall score of 87 against 75.2. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3 version. The Motorola razr (2020) design is extremely newer and thinner than Xiaomi Mi 4's, although it is a lot heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 has a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density and a little higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with lot more MP, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3080mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi 4, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.