Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2014-07-22 | -- |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 4, having a score of 76.2 against 75.2. Galaxy A16 5G is a thinner but extremely heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 4. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A16 5G has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3. The Xiaomi Mi 4 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 4 counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has 4 lesser cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3080mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A16 5G is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.