Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 4, getting an 83.8 score against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is a lot newer and thinner than Xiaomi Mi 4's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 4 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Xiaomi Mi 4 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy A50 captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.