Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 4's score of 75.2. Galaxy A52's design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 4. The Xiaomi Mi 4 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.