Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 4's 75.2 overall score. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3. Even though the Galaxy F62 is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Mi 4, it is notably heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density. Xiaomi Mi 4 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 4 also counts with a GPU.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.