Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 4's 75.2 general score. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3. The Galaxy Fold body is newer and incredibly thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 4.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more processing cores and 9 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 4 has a much better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has a less MP camera in the back and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy Fold features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi 4. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi 4, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.