Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2014-07-22 | -- |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.26 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 4's 75.2 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi 4.
Galaxy S25 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has a bit lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 4 has a way better processing power than Galaxy S25, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot higher video definition and a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
The Galaxy S25 features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi 4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.