Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2014-07-22 | -- |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.26 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than Xiaomi Mi 4's score of 75.2. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 4.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a quite higher pixel density, a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a way larger screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 4 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 9 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a 62 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.