Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xiaomi Mi 4, getting a score of 88.5 against 75.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3. The Galaxy Z Flip is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 4, but it's also heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Xiaomi Mi 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip features just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi 4. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 4, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.