Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.48 x 2.70 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 329.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Qualcomm Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 4's 75.2 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 4, it's a lot thinner and also incredibly newer. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 4 has Android 4.4.3.
Xiaomi Mi 4 has a better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 4, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi 4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi 4, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.